Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Tinjauan Lingkup Pemetaan Lapangan× | Analisis Bibliometrik× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Saintometrika | Saintometrika |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–2018 | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| Pencetus≠ | Arksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al. | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| Tipe≠ | Evidence synthesis — systematic review variant | Quantitative literature analysis |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| Alias | field-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mapping | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| Terkait | 6 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | A field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|