Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Evaluasi Program Berbasis Lapangan× | Riset Studi Kasus× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Metode Lapangan | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1970s–1980s (field methods integration with evaluation practice) | 1984 (seminal codification) |
| Pencetus≠ | Michael Q. Patton; Peter H. Rossi and Howard E. Freeman | Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984) |
| Tipe≠ | Applied evaluation research | Qualitative research design |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908944 | Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Alias≠ | naturalistic program evaluation, field evaluation, on-site program evaluation, field-based evaluation | Vaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Field-based program evaluation is an applied research method that assesses the implementation, outcomes, and value of a program by collecting data directly in the natural setting where the program operates. Rather than relying solely on administrative records or remote surveys, evaluators embed themselves in the field — observing activities, interviewing stakeholders on-site, and reviewing context-specific documents — to produce evidence-grounded judgments about program merit and worth. | Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|