Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Analisis Fenomenologis Interpretif Berbasis Lapangan× | Inkuiri Naratif Berbasis Lapangan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1999–2009 (IPA seminal; field-based adaptation emerging 2000s–2010s) | 1990s–2000s |
| Pencetus≠ | Smith, Flowers & Larkin (IPA); field extension drawn from ethnographic fieldwork traditions | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative research approach | Qualitative research design |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943943 |
| Alias | Field IPA, Fieldwork IPA, Field-based IPA, Field-grounded interpretive phenomenology | field narrative inquiry, naturalistic narrative inquiry, field-situated narrative research, in-situ narrative inquiry |
| Terkait≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Field-based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Field IPA) extends standard IPA by embedding data collection within naturalistic field settings. Rather than relying solely on retrospective interviews conducted away from the site of experience, the researcher enters the actual environment — a classroom, clinic, workplace, or community space — to gather field observations, artefacts, and in-context conversations alongside in-depth interviews. This produces a richer, more situated account of how participants make sense of their lived experience in the moment and place in which it unfolds. | Field-based narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that investigates human experience by collecting and interpreting stories directly within the natural settings where those experiences unfold. Rooted in Clandinin and Connelly's narrative inquiry framework, it moves the researcher into participants' lived worlds — classrooms, workplaces, communities — to gather rich field texts that preserve the contextual, temporal, and relational dimensions of experience through story. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|