ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Remodeling Tulang FEA×Analisis Sinergi Otot×Analisis porositas perancah×
BidangBiomekanikaBiomekanikaBiomekanika
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal198719992000
PencetusRik HuiskesMarc TreschDietmar Hutmacher
TipeMulti-physics finite element pipelineDimensionality reduction and pattern extractionQuantitative morphological analysis
Sumber perintisHuiskes, R., Weinans, H., Grootenboer, H. J., Dalstra, M., Fudala, B., & Slooff, T. J. (1987). Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 20(11-12), 1135-1150. DOI ↗Tresch, M. C., Saltiel, P., Bizzi, E., & Bizzi, E. (1999). The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 162-167. DOI ↗Hutmacher, D. W. (2000). Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21(24), 2529-2543. DOI ↗
AliasBone remodeling simulation, Trabecular architecture adaptation, Mechano-regulationMotor synergy, Synergy extraction, Motor primitivesPore size distribution, Porosity measurement, Scaffold characterization
Terkait333
RingkasanFinite element analysis (FEA) for bone remodeling predicts how bone tissue density and architecture adapt to changes in mechanical loading over time. Pioneered by Rik Huiskes and Donald Carter in the 1980s, this computational approach integrates stress analysis with biophysical remodeling rules to simulate the long-term response of bone to disease, aging, or surgical intervention.Muscle synergy analysis decomposes complex motor behavior into a small set of coactivated muscle groups (synergies or motor primitives). Pioneered by Marc Tresch and colleagues studying frog motor control, this approach reveals how the nervous system simplifies the control of many muscles by organizing them into task-relevant combinations.Scaffold porosity analysis characterizes the pore structure of tissue engineering scaffolds, including total porosity, pore size distribution, pore shape, and pore interconnectivity. Essential for predicting cell seeding, nutrient diffusion, and mechanical properties, this quantitative approach bridges scaffold design and biological performance.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: FEA Bone Remodeling · Muscle Synergy Analysis · Scaffold Porosity Analysis. Diakses 2026-06-20 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare