ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Discourse Completion Task×Analisis Isi×Matched-Guise Technique×
BidangLinguistikKualitatifLinguistik
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal1989Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181960
PencetusShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (CCSARP project)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchWallace Lambert and colleagues
TipeWritten/oral elicitation instrument for speech-act dataQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueIndirect experimental measure of language attitudes
Sumber perintisBlum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.) (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex Publishing. ISBN: 9780893915131Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. DOI ↗
AliasDiscourse Completion Test, DCT, Production Questionnaireİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisMatched Guise Test, Matched-Guise Experiment, Language Attitude Matched Guise
Terkait352
RingkasanThe discourse completion task (DCT) is an elicitation instrument widely used in pragmatics to gather data on how people perform speech acts such as requests, apologies, refusals, and compliments. Respondents read short descriptions of situations and write (or say) what they would utter in each, allowing researchers to collect comparable speech-act data across many speakers, languages, and cultures under controlled conditions. It was popularized by the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) of Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper in 1989.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.The matched-guise technique is an indirect experimental method for measuring attitudes toward languages, dialects, and accents. Developed by Wallace Lambert and colleagues in 1960, it has the same bilingual or bidialectal speaker record the same passage in two or more language varieties ('guises'); listeners, believing they are hearing different speakers, rate each recording on personality and status traits. Because the voice, content, and delivery are held constant, any differences in the ratings can be attributed to listeners' attitudes toward the variety itself.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Discourse Completion Task · Content Analysis · Matched-Guise Technique. Diakses 2026-06-25 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare