Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Desain Riset dan Metode Sejarah Lisan Digital× | Sejarah Lisan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1990s–2000s (systematic digital integration) | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Pencetus≠ | Oral history tradition (Allan Nevins, 1940s); digital adaptation by Michael Frisch and others from the 1990s onward | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative research design with digital data collection and archiving | Qualitative research method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Boyd, D., & Larson, M. (Eds.). (2014). Oral History and Digital Humanities: Voice, Access, and Engagement. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1137322678 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Alias | digital oral history, DOH, digital oral narrative research, online oral history | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Terkait≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Digital Oral History is a qualitative research method that uses digital technologies — audio and video recorders, online platforms, and digital archives — to collect, preserve, and disseminate first-person oral accounts of lived experience. It extends the established oral history tradition by leveraging digital tools to enhance accessibility, reach geographically dispersed participants, and enable long-term preservation and public engagement with recorded narratives. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|