Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Riset Sejarah Hidup Digital× | Sejarah Lisan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2000s (digital turn in life history; rooted in life history tradition since ~1920s) | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Pencetus≠ | Building on Goodson, Roberts, and broader biographical research traditions; digital extension from 2000s onward | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative biographical research design | Qualitative research method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Goodson, I., & Gill, S. (2017). The Narrative Turn in Social Research. In I. Goodson & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering Counter-Narratives (pp. 1–24). John Benjamins. link ↗ | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Alias | digital life story research, DLHR, online life history method, digital biographical method | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Terkait≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Digital Life History Research is a qualitative biographical method that investigates how individuals construct, narrate, and preserve their life stories using digital tools and environments. It extends the classical life history tradition into online spaces — gathering data through video interviews, asynchronous email narratives, digital diaries, social media timelines, and multimedia life documents — to understand personal and social experience across time. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|