Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Teori Dasar Digital× | Teori Beralasan Konstruktivis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2000s–2010s (as digital data became mainstream in qualitative research) | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| Pencetus≠ | Adapted from Glaser & Strauss (1967); digital application developed through the work of Murthy (2008) and others in online qualitative research | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. DOI ↗ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Alias | DGT, online grounded theory, internet-based grounded theory, grounded theory in digital contexts | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| Terkait | 6 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Digital Grounded Theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory to data gathered from digital and online environments — social media platforms, forums, blogs, comment sections, and other internet-mediated communication. Rather than simply using grounded theory on text that happens to come from digital sources, it involves adapting sampling, collection, and ethical procedures to the specific affordances and constraints of online data, while retaining the core commitment to theory generation grounded in empirical material. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|