Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Analisis Fungsi Item Diferensial (DIF)× | Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Psikometri | Psikometri |
| Keluarga | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1988 | 1969 |
| Pencetus≠ | Paul W. Holland & Dorothy T. Thayer (Mantel-Haenszel approach, 1988) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Tipe≠ | Item-level fairness / measurement equivalence analysis | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Holland, P. W. & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. ETS Research Report Series. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Madde Yanlılık Analizi (DIF — Differential Item Functioning), item bias analysis, Mantel-Haenszel DIF, Lord chi-square DIF | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Terkait | 4 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Differential Item Functioning analysis examines whether examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — who have the same underlying ability respond differently to a test item. First formalised by Holland and Thayer in 1988 via the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, it is the principal tool in modern test development for detecting and removing item bias. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|