ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Model Prediksi Cacat×Metrik Kompleksitas Perangkat Lunak×
BidangRekayasa Perangkat LunakRekayasa Perangkat Lunak
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal20051976
PencetusThomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert BellThomas J. McCabe
Tipemachine learning modelquantitative measurement
Sumber perintisOstrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
Aliasfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classificationcode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
Terkait44
RingkasanDefect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Defect Prediction Model · Software Complexity Metrics. Diakses 2026-06-15 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare