Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Analisis Wacana Kritis× | Teori Beralasan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Kualitatif | Penelitian Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) | 1967 |
| Pencetus≠ | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|