Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Studi Kasus Kritis× | Teori Beralasan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Kualitatif | Penelitian Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1980s–2006 (formalized) | 1967 |
| Pencetus≠ | Bent Flyvbjerg (formalized); Robert K. Yin (case study typology) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. DOI ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | critical case, strategic case study, critical-instance case study, paradigmatic case study | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | A critical case study is a case study design in which the researcher deliberately selects a case that is strategically important for testing, confirming, challenging, or extending an existing proposition, theory, or policy claim. Rather than choosing a typical or representative case, the researcher argues that if the finding holds here — in this most-likely, least-likely, or paradigmatic instance — it can reasonably be expected to hold more broadly. This purposive logic transforms a single case into a powerful analytical tool. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|