ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Pentingnya Kriteria Melalui Korelasi Antar Kriteria×Metode Urutan Peringkat Alternatif yang Mempertimbangkan Normalisasi Dua Langkah×
BidangPengambilan KeputusanPengambilan Keputusan
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal19952022
PencetusDiakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipeStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weightingTwo-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Sumber perintisDiakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Alias
Terkait88
RingkasanCRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: CRITIC · AROMAN. Diakses 2026-06-18 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare