ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Penjelasan Kontrafaktual×Random Forest×
BidangPembelajaran MesinPembelajaran Mesin
KeluargaMachine learningMachine learning
Tahun asal20172001
PencetusSandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt & Chris RussellBreiman, L.
TipePost-hoc, model-agnostic explanationEnsemble (bagging of decision trees)
Sumber perintisWachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31, 841–887. link ↗Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. DOI ↗
AliasAlgorithmic Recourse, Contrastive Explanations, What-If Explanations, Karşıolgusal AçıklamalarRastgele Orman (Random Forest), rastgele orman, random decision forest, bagged tree ensemble
Terkait24
RingkasanCounterfactual explanations, introduced by Wachter, Mittelstadt, and Russell in 2017, answer the question: 'What is the smallest change to the input that would have produced a different model output?' Rather than explaining why a model made a decision, they describe what would need to change for that decision to be reversed, making them particularly valuable for high-stakes applications such as credit scoring, medical diagnosis, and hiring decisions under frameworks like the EU GDPR.Random Forest is an ensemble learning method, introduced by Leo Breiman in 2001, that grows many decision trees on bootstrap samples of the data and combines their votes to produce strong classification and regression. By pooling many slightly different trees, it produces more accurate and more stable predictions than any single tree.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Counterfactual Explanations · Random Forest. Diakses 2026-06-19 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare