Bandingkan metode

	Corporatism Index	Corporatism Analysis
Bidang	Political Economy	Political Economy
Keluarga	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tahun asal	1999	1974
Pencetus	Alan Siaroff & Lane Kenworthy	Philippe C. Schmitter
Tipe	Composite institutional index	Conceptual-comparative framework
Sumber perintis	Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), 175-205.	Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85-131.
Alias	Corporatism Score, Wage Coordination Index, Bargaining Centralization Index, Siaroff Corporatism Index	Neo-Corporatism Analysis, Interest Intermediation Analysis, Concertation Analysis, Corporatism vs Pluralism Framework
Terkait	3	3
Ringkasan	A corporatism index is a quantitative scaling of how centralized and coordinated a country's system of wage bargaining and interest intermediation is. Where the conceptual corporatism framework describes the institutional pattern in which peak associations of labor and capital negotiate with the state, a corporatism index turns that pattern into comparable numbers. The two landmark efforts are Alan Siaroff's 1999 integrated scale for 24 industrial democracies and Lane Kenworthy's 2003 systematic review and reconstruction of the available indicators. Both combine measures such as bargaining centralization, wage-setting coordination, union and employer organizational concentration, and the degree of tripartite concertation into a composite score that ranks countries from pluralist and decentralized at the low end to strongly corporatist and coordinated at the high end.	Corporatism analysis is the conceptual and comparative framework for characterizing how organized interests are represented and incorporated into policymaking, defined classically by Philippe Schmitter's 1974 essay 'Still the Century of Corporatism?'. Schmitter contrasts corporatism — a system in which a limited number of singular, compulsory, non-competitive, hierarchically ordered peak associations are recognized or licensed by the state and granted a representational monopoly in exchange for controlling their members — with pluralism, in which many voluntary, competing, non-hierarchical associations vie for influence. The framework further distinguishes societal from state corporatism and analyzes tripartite concertation among government, labor, and capital.