ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Penilaian Proporsional Kompleks×Metode pembobotan objektif Dampak Kriteria LOS (CILOS)×
BidangPengambilan KeputusanPengambilan Keputusan
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal19962016
PencetusZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipeProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Sumber perintisZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Alias
Terkait88
RingkasanCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: COPRAS · CILOS. Diakses 2026-06-17 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare