ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Teori Beralasan Konstruktivis×Riset Studi Kasus×
BidangKualitatifKualitatif
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)1984 (seminal codification)
PencetusKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)
TipeQualitative research methodQualitative research design
Sumber perintisCharmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
AliasCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theoryVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology
Terkait65
RingkasanConstructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Constructivist Grounded Theory · Case Study. Diakses 2026-06-15 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare