ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Analisis Konjoin×Desain Faktorial Pecahan 2^(k-p)×
BidangDesain EksperimenDesain Eksperimen
KeluargaHypothesis testHypothesis test
Tahun asal19781961
PencetusPaul E. Green & V. SrinivasanGeorge E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter
TipeDecomposition-based utility estimationScreening and economical factorial design
Sumber perintisGreen, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. DOI ↗Box, G.E.P. & Hunter, J.S. (1961). The 2^(k-p) Fractional Factorial Designs. Technometrics, 3(3), 311–351. link ↗
AliasCBC conjoint, choice-based conjoint, adaptive conjoint analysis, full-profile conjoint2^k-p design, fractional factorial, screening design, Kesirli Faktöriyel Desen (2^k-p Fractional Factorial)
Terkait67
RingkasanConjoint analysis is a preference-measurement technique that decomposes overall product evaluations into the separate utility values — called part-worths — that respondents assign to each attribute level. Formalised by Green and Srinivasan in their seminal 1978 Journal of Consumer Research paper, the method has become the dominant tool in marketing research and product design for quantifying what buyers truly trade off when they choose between options.The fractional factorial design is an economical experimental strategy that investigates k factors by running only a carefully chosen 1/2^p fraction of the full 2^k factorial experiment. Formalized by George E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter in their landmark 1961 Technometrics paper, it exploits the sparsity-of-effects principle — that high-order interactions are typically negligible — to screen many factors with far fewer runs than a complete factorial would require.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Conjoint Analysis · Fractional Factorial Design. Diakses 2026-06-18 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare