Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Studi Kasus Ganda Komparatif× | Penelitian Naratif Komparatif× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Kualitatif | Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1984 (Yin); 2006 (Stake multiple-case analysis) | 1990s–2000s |
| Pencetus≠ | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Tipe | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Alias | multi-site case study, cross-case analysis, comparative case research, multi-case comparative design | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Terkait≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Comparative multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify patterns, contrasts, and transferable findings. Rooted in Robert Yin's case study methodology and Robert Stake's multiple-case analysis framework, it combines the rich contextual insight of single-case work with the analytical leverage gained by examining how phenomena unfold similarly or differently across distinct settings. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|