Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Etnografi Komparatif× | Teori Beralasan× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang≠ | Kualitatif | Penelitian Kualitatif |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) | 1967 |
| Pencetus≠ | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipe≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Method |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|