Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Pengujian Invarian Pengukuran Bayesian× | Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Psikometri | Psikometri |
| Keluarga | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2013 | 1969 |
| Pencetus≠ | Bengt Muthen, Tihomir Asparouhov, Rens Van de Schoot | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Tipe≠ | Bayesian multigroup latent variable test | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthen, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 770. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Bayesian MI, approximate measurement invariance, Bayesian multigroup CFA invariance, BSEM measurement invariance | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Terkait≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Ringkasan≠ | Bayesian measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a scale's factor loadings and item intercepts are equivalent across groups, using a Bayesian framework that allows parameters to deviate from strict equality by a small, probabilistically specified amount rather than imposing an exact constraint. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|