Bandingkan metode

	Penilaian Validitas Diskriminan Bayesian	Validitas Konstruk
Bidang	Psikometri	Psikometri
Keluarga	Latent structure	Latent structure
Tahun asal	2020 (Bayesian HTMT formalization); 1959 (discriminant validity concept)	1955
Pencetus	Adaptation of Campbell & Fiske (1959) discriminant validity into Bayesian CFA framework; Bayesian HTMT formalization by Garnier-Villarreal & Jorgensen (2020)	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Tipe	Validity assessment	Validity evaluation framework
Sumber perintis	Garnier-Villarreal, M. & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 46–70.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Alias	Bayesian HTMT, Bayesian HTMTb, Bayesian discriminant evidence, Bayesian CFA discriminant validity	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Terkait	6	6
Ringkasan	Bayesian discriminant validity assessment evaluates whether two theoretically distinct latent constructs are empirically separable, using posterior distributions and credible intervals rather than single-point null-hypothesis tests. It is applied within Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis or via the Bayesian heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMTb) to determine whether constructs measuring different traits are sufficiently differentiated.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.