Bandingkan metode

	Penilaian Validitas Diskriminan Bayesian	Pengujian Invarian Pengukuran Bayesian
Bidang	Psikometri	Psikometri
Keluarga	Latent structure	Latent structure
Tahun asal	2020 (Bayesian HTMT formalization); 1959 (discriminant validity concept)	2013
Pencetus	Adaptation of Campbell & Fiske (1959) discriminant validity into Bayesian CFA framework; Bayesian HTMT formalization by Garnier-Villarreal & Jorgensen (2020)	Bengt Muthen, Tihomir Asparouhov, Rens Van de Schoot
Tipe	Validity assessment	Bayesian multigroup latent variable test
Sumber perintis	Garnier-Villarreal, M. & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 46–70.	Van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthen, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 770.
Alias	Bayesian HTMT, Bayesian HTMTb, Bayesian discriminant evidence, Bayesian CFA discriminant validity	Bayesian MI, approximate measurement invariance, Bayesian multigroup CFA invariance, BSEM measurement invariance
Terkait	6	6
Ringkasan	Bayesian discriminant validity assessment evaluates whether two theoretically distinct latent constructs are empirically separable, using posterior distributions and credible intervals rather than single-point null-hypothesis tests. It is applied within Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis or via the Bayesian heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMTb) to determine whether constructs measuring different traits are sufficiently differentiated.	Bayesian measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a scale's factor loadings and item intercepts are equivalent across groups, using a Bayesian framework that allows parameters to deviate from strict equality by a small, probabilistically specified amount rather than imposing an exact constraint.