ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Studi Akurasi Diagnostik Bayesian×Evaluasi Uji Saring×
BidangEpidemiologiEpidemiologi
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal1995–20011968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
PencetusJoseph, Gyorkos & Coupal; Dendukuri & Joseph (formal Bayesian DTA framework)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
TipeBayesian inferential study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Sumber perintisDendukuri, N., & Joseph, L. (2001). Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics, 57(1), 158–167. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
AliasBayesian DTA study, Bayesian test evaluation, Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy, BDASscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Terkait66
RingkasanA Bayesian diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a medical test distinguishes between people who have a condition and those who do not, using Bayesian statistical methods that formally incorporate prior knowledge into the estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures. Unlike classical approaches that rely solely on the observed sample, Bayesian inference combines a likelihood model of the data with prior probability distributions to produce posterior estimates with intuitive credible intervals.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Bayesian Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Screening Test Evaluation. Diakses 2026-06-15 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare