Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Penilaian Rasio Aditif× | Pentingnya Kriteria Melalui Korelasi Antar Kriteria× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2010 | 1995 |
| Pencetus≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tipe≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Terkait | 8 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|