Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Proses Jaringan Analitik (AHP dengan umpan balik dan saling ketergantungan)× | Pentingnya Kriteria Melalui Korelasi Antar Kriteria× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1996 | 1995 |
| Pencetus≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tipe≠ | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Terkait | 8 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|