ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Proses Jaringan Analitik (AHP dengan umpan balik dan saling ketergantungan)×Penilaian Proporsional Kompleks×
BidangPengambilan KeputusanPengambilan Keputusan
KeluargaMCDMMCDM
Tahun asal19961996
PencetusSaaty, T. L.Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
TipeWeight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Sumber perintisSaaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗
Alias
Terkait88
RingkasanANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Unduh salindia

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: ANP · COPRAS. Diakses 2026-06-19 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare