Zapis dokaza metode

Social Identity Political Measurement

Social identity measurement in political behavior applies social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) to political groups, treating partisanship, ideology, or movement membership as a social identity rather than a mere instrumental affiliation. Huddy, Mason and Aaroe (2015) adapted Mael and Tetlock-style identity items into a partisan social-identity scale that measures expressive, emotionally charged group attachment and predicts campaign activity and political emotion better than issue agreement.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Izvorni zapis

Citati kopirani doslovno iz izvornog zapisa metode. Ne impliciraju nikakvu provjeru na razini tvrdnje.

Social Identity Measurement in Political Behavior

Taksonomski zapis metode · process-pipeline / political-psychology

Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17. · DOI 10.1017/S0003055414000604
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. · ISBN 9780818502781

Otvori cijelu metodu

Uređene tvrdnje

Tvrdnje pohranjene u knjigu dokaza, svaka s vlastitom procjenom.

Nema uređenih tvrdnji

Ovaj prikaz ne izmišlja procjenu tvrdnje kada knjiga dokaza nema nijednu.

Povezane metode

Generirano iz grafa metode i prikazano kao strojno predložene relacije — ne implicira se nikakva tvrdnja dokaza.

Same method familyAffective Polarization Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGroup Identity Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyNational Identity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPartisan Identity Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.