Prijeđi na sadržajScholarGate
KnjižnicaMoja knjižnicaStolReview StudioAsistent
Prijavite se
Literary Warrant Analysis/Dokaz
Zapis dokaza metode

Literary Warrant Analysis

Literary warrant analysis is the method of justifying the classes and terms of a knowledge-organization system by reference to the actual content of a domain's published literature, rather than to abstract logic or a designer's intuition. The principle, traceable to E. Wyndham Hulme's 1911 idea that classification should be warranted by the books that exist, was given an empirical, corpus-based operationalization by Clare Beghtol in her study of fiction studies, where she used subject descriptors in a bibliographic database to quantify how strongly the domain's literature supported particular concepts and where the field reached consensus. Within Hjørland and Albrechtsen's domain-analysis programme, literary warrant is the empirical anchor that ties a classification or thesaurus to the discourse it serves. The analysis assembles a representative corpus, extracts and counts concepts, measures their warrant, gauges consensus, and lets that evidence determine what the system should contain and how finely it should distinguish.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Izvorni zapis

Citati kopirani doslovno iz izvornog zapisa metode. Ne impliciraju nikakvu provjeru na razini tvrdnje.

Literary Warrant Analysis (Grounding Classes and Terms in Published Literature)
Taksonomski zapis metode · process-pipeline / library-information-science
  • Beghtol, C. (1995). Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus: The case of fiction studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 30-44. · DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199501)46:1<30::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-F
  • Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425. · DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y
Otvori cijelu metodu

Uređene tvrdnje

Tvrdnje pohranjene u knjigu dokaza, svaka s vlastitom procjenom.

Nema uređenih tvrdnji

Ovaj prikaz ne izmišlja procjenu tvrdnje kada knjiga dokaza nema nijednu.

Povezane metode

Generirano iz grafa metode i prikazano kao strojno predložene relacije — ne implicira se nikakva tvrdnja dokaza.

Taxonomic bucketDomain Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyFacet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyThesaurus Constructionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status dokaza

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Izvori

2 zabilježenih citata, kopiranih iz izvornog zapisa metode.

Akcije

Otvori stranicu metode
ScholarGate

Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda usmjerena na sadržaj — što je svaka metoda, kako funkcionira i odakle potječe.

Otvoreni podaci (CC-BY)

Otkrij

  • Knjižnica
  • Pretražite metode…
  • Pregled po područjima
  • Područja
  • Put
  • Usporedi
  • Koja metoda?

Referenca

  • Područja
  • Atlas
  • Pojmovnik
  • Metodologija
  • Filozofija

Radni prostor

  • Moja knjižnica
  • Stol
  • Razgovor

Tvrtka

  • O nama
  • Cijene
  • Kontakt
  • Predložite metodu

Unosi su sastavljeni iz objavljenih izvora u referentne svrhe. Provjera točnosti i prikladnosti svake informacije za vašu vlastitu upotrebu ostaje vaša odgovornost.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda
  • Privatnost
  • Kolačići
  • Uvjeti korištenja
  • Izbriši račun