Prijeđi na sadržajScholarGate
KnjižnicaMoja knjižnicaStolReview StudioAsistent
Prijavite se
Encounter Norm Analysis/Dokaz
Zapis dokaza metode

Encounter Norm Analysis

Encounter norm analysis is the normative-survey pipeline used to set standards for visitor impacts in parks and protected areas. Building on Vaske, Shelby, Graefe, and Heberlein's 1986 formalization of backcountry encounter norms, it asks recreationists to evaluate the acceptability of a range of conditions — most classically the number of other groups encountered per day, but also people at one time, campsite sharing, or depicted impact levels — and aggregates those evaluations into a social norm curve. The curve locates the minimum acceptable condition where acceptability crosses from positive to negative, supplying a defensible numeric standard. The method also quantifies the structural properties of norms: their intensity (how strongly conditions are evaluated), prevalence (whether respondents hold a norm at all), and crystallization (the degree of agreement), the last now commonly indexed by the Potential for Conflict Index (PCI2). Robert Manning's synthesis in Parks and Carrying Capacity made this normative approach the empirical core of indicators-and-standards frameworks.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Izvorni zapis

Citati kopirani doslovno iz izvornog zapisa metode. Ne impliciraju nikakvu provjeru na razini tvrdnje.

Encounter Norm Analysis (Normative Standards and Acceptability Curves)
Taksonomski zapis metode · process-pipeline / sport-leisure-studies
  • Vaske, J. J., Shelby, B., Graefe, A. R., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Backcountry Encounter Norms: Theory, Method and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 18(3), 137-153. · DOI 10.1080/00222216.1986.11969653
  • Manning, R. E. (2007). Parks and Carrying Capacity: Commons Without Tragedy. Washington, DC: Island Press. · ISBN 9781559631051
Otvori cijelu metodu

Uređene tvrdnje

Tvrdnje pohranjene u knjigu dokaza, svaka s vlastitom procjenom.

Nema uređenih tvrdnji

Ovaj prikaz ne izmišlja procjenu tvrdnje kada knjiga dokaza nema nijednu.

Povezane metode

Generirano iz grafa metode i prikazano kao strojno predložene relacije — ne implicira se nikakva tvrdnja dokaza.

Taxonomic bucketCrowding Norm Curve Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Conflict and Coping Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Specialization Continuummachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Substitutability Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status dokaza

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Izvori

2 zabilježenih citata, kopiranih iz izvornog zapisa metode.

Akcije

Otvori stranicu metode
ScholarGate

Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda usmjerena na sadržaj — što je svaka metoda, kako funkcionira i odakle potječe.

Otvoreni podaci (CC-BY)

Otkrij

  • Knjižnica
  • Pretražite metode…
  • Pregled po područjima
  • Područja
  • Put
  • Usporedi
  • Koja metoda?

Referenca

  • Područja
  • Atlas
  • Pojmovnik
  • Metodologija
  • Filozofija

Radni prostor

  • Moja knjižnica
  • Stol
  • Razgovor

Tvrtka

  • O nama
  • Cijene
  • Kontakt
  • Predložite metodu

Unosi su sastavljeni iz objavljenih izvora u referentne svrhe. Provjera točnosti i prikladnosti svake informacije za vašu vlastitu upotrebu ostaje vaša odgovornost.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda
  • Privatnost
  • Kolačići
  • Uvjeti korištenja
  • Izbriši račun