Prijeđi na sadržajScholarGate
KnjižnicaMoja knjižnicaStolReview StudioAsistent
Prijavite se
Crowding Norm Curve Analysis/Dokaz
Zapis dokaza metode

Crowding Norm Curve Analysis

Crowding norm curve analysis is a field-survey pipeline for measuring how crowded recreationists feel and for translating their evaluations of density into management standards. Its measurement backbone is the standard single-item 9-point crowding question introduced in Shelby and Heberlein's 1986 book Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings, on which visitors rate how crowded a setting felt from 'not at all crowded' (1-2) to 'extremely crowded' (8-9). Perceived crowding is a normative evaluation, not a raw density: it is the negative judgment people make about the number of people or encounters they experienced. Vaske and Shelby's 2008 synthesis of thirty years and more than 180 studies showed that this single item behaves consistently, that respondents scoring 3 or higher are conventionally classified as feeling crowded, and that several ways of summarizing the scale correlate above .90. Paired with acceptability evaluations of different densities, the method yields social norm curves that locate the use level at which conditions become unacceptable — a basis for capacity standards.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Izvorni zapis

Citati kopirani doslovno iz izvornog zapisa metode. Ne impliciraju nikakvu provjeru na razini tvrdnje.

Crowding Norm Curve Analysis (Perceived Crowding and Density-Acceptability Norms)
Taksonomski zapis metode · process-pipeline / sport-leisure-studies
  • Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press. · ISBN 9780870714269
  • Vaske, J. J., & Shelby, L. B. (2008). Crowding as a Descriptive Indicator and an Evaluative Standard: Results from 30 Years of Research. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 111-126. · DOI 10.1080/01490400701881341
Otvori cijelu metodu

Uređene tvrdnje

Tvrdnje pohranjene u knjigu dokaza, svaka s vlastitom procjenom.

Nema uređenih tvrdnji

Ovaj prikaz ne izmišlja procjenu tvrdnje kada knjiga dokaza nema nijednu.

Povezane metode

Generirano iz grafa metode i prikazano kao strojno predložene relacije — ne implicira se nikakva tvrdnja dokaza.

Taxonomic bucketEncounter Norm Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Conflict and Coping Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Specialization Continuummachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Substitutability Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status dokaza

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Izvori

2 zabilježenih citata, kopiranih iz izvornog zapisa metode.

Akcije

Otvori stranicu metode
ScholarGate

Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda usmjerena na sadržaj — što je svaka metoda, kako funkcionira i odakle potječe.

Otvoreni podaci (CC-BY)

Otkrij

  • Knjižnica
  • Pretražite metode…
  • Pregled po područjima
  • Područja
  • Put
  • Usporedi
  • Koja metoda?

Referenca

  • Područja
  • Atlas
  • Pojmovnik
  • Metodologija
  • Filozofija

Radni prostor

  • Moja knjižnica
  • Stol
  • Razgovor

Tvrtka

  • O nama
  • Cijene
  • Kontakt
  • Predložite metodu

Unosi su sastavljeni iz objavljenih izvora u referentne svrhe. Provjera točnosti i prikladnosti svake informacije za vašu vlastitu upotrebu ostaje vaša odgovornost.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda
  • Privatnost
  • Kolačići
  • Uvjeti korištenja
  • Izbriši račun