Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
पूरी विधि पढ़ें
यह खंड पढ़ने के लिए निःशुल्क खाते से साइन इन करें।
पद्धति मानचित्र
सम्बन्धित पद्धतियों का परिवेश — अन्वेषण हेतु किसी नोड का चयन करें।
स्रोत
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x ↗
इस पृष्ठ का उद्धरण कैसे दें
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis of Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hi/public-administration/bureaucratic-reputation-analysis
कौन-सी पद्धति?
इस पद्धति को उसकी निकटतम सजातीय पद्धतियों के साथ रखकर उन्हें साथ-साथ पढ़ें — पुस्तकालय पुस्तकें मेज़ पर रख देता है; चुनाव आपका है।
- New Public Management AssessmentPublic Administration↔ तुलना करें
- Regulatory Enforcement AnalysisPublic Administration↔ तुलना करें
- Transparency IndexPublic Administration↔ तुलना करें
- Whole-of-Government AnalysisPublic Administration↔ तुलना करें