Value Conflict Measurement
Value conflict measurement quantifies the tension citizens feel when an issue pits two values they both cherish against each other, and traces its cognitive consequences. Philip Tetlock's value pluralism model holds that people reason in integratively complex ways precisely when an issue activates conflicting values they regard as important and roughly equal in weight. Stanley Feldman and John Zaller showed that this conflict, between values such as equality and economic individualism over the welfare state, produces ambivalence: opinions built from opposing considerations that are unstable and sensitive to how questions are framed. Together these approaches measure value conflict and link it to complexity, ambivalence, and the instability of political attitudes.
पूरी विधि पढ़ें
यह खंड पढ़ने के लिए निःशुल्क खाते से साइन इन करें।
पद्धति मानचित्र
सम्बन्धित पद्धतियों का परिवेश — अन्वेषण हेतु किसी नोड का चयन करें।
स्रोत
- Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819-827. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819 ↗
- Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. (1992). The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State. American Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 268-307. link ↗
इस पृष्ठ का उद्धरण कैसे दें
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Value Conflict and Ambivalence Measurement (Value Pluralism Approach). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hi/political-psychology/value-conflict-measurement
कौन-सी पद्धति?
इस पद्धति को उसकी निकटतम सजातीय पद्धतियों के साथ रखकर उन्हें साथ-साथ पढ़ें — पुस्तकालय पुस्तकें मेज़ पर रख देता है; चुनाव आपका है।
- Open-Ended Political Response Codingराजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान↔ तुलना करें
- Post-Materialism Indexराजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान↔ तुलना करें
- Schwartz Value Surveyराजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान↔ तुलना करें