विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| मजबूत नॉमोलॉजिकल वैधता× | विविधता वैधता× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | मनोमिति | मनोमिति |
| परिवार | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| प्रकार≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| संबंधित | 5 | 5 |
| सारांश≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|