विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| पूर्वव्यापी कोहॉर्ट अध्ययन× | अनुप्रस्थ काट (Cross-sectional) महामारी विज्ञान अध्ययन× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | महामारी विज्ञान | महामारी विज्ञान |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | Mid-20th century (widely formalized 1950s–1970s) | 1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Systematic use attributed to early 20th-century occupational epidemiology; formalized in modern epidemiological theory by Brian MacMahon and others | Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s) |
| प्रकार≠ | Observational analytic study | Observational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407 |
| उपनाम | historical cohort study, non-concurrent cohort study, retrospective follow-up study, historical prospective study | prevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design |
| संबंधित | 6 | 6 |
| सारांश≠ | A retrospective cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point and reconstructs their exposure history and subsequent outcomes entirely from pre-existing records. Because the data have already been collected before the study begins, the design is far faster and cheaper than a prospective cohort; however, the researcher must work with whatever information was recorded at the time rather than collecting purpose-built measurements. | A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|