ScholarGate
सहायक

विधियों की तुलना करें

चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।

गुणात्मक अनुसंधान में परावर्तनशीलता (Reflexivity)×गुणात्मक अनुसंधान में विश्वसनीयता के मानदंड×
क्षेत्रगुणात्मक अनुसंधानगुणात्मक अनुसंधान
परिवारProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
उद्भव वर्ष19901985
प्रवर्तकAnthony Giddens and Pierre BourdieuYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
प्रकारConceptFramework
मौलिक स्रोतFinlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531-545. DOI ↗Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
उपनामreflexive practice, researcher reflexivity, positionality, reflective practicetrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
संबंधित44
सारांशReflexivity is the practice of examining how the researcher's identity, assumptions, relationships, and values influence the research process and findings. Rather than treating objectivity as achievable detachment, reflexivity acknowledges that the researcher is embedded within the research and cannot be fully separated from it. Originating in sociology and anthropology, reflexivity has become central to qualitative research rigor across disciplines. Reflexive researchers critically examine their own influence at each stage: research design, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation, and presentation. This transparency strengthens rigor by making visible the lens through which data are collected and interpreted.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGateडेटासेट
  1. v1
  2. 4 स्रोत
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 स्रोत
  3. PUBLISHED

खोज पर जाएँ स्लाइड डाउनलोड करें

ScholarGateविधियों की तुलना करें: Reflexivity in Qualitative Research · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. 2026-06-20 को यहाँ से प्राप्त https://scholargate.app/hi/compare