विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| सहभागी आलोचनात्मक विमर्श विश्लेषण× | विमर्श विश्लेषण (Discourse Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र≠ | गुणात्मक | गुणात्मक अनुसंधान |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1990s–2000s (emerged as integrated approach) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Draws on Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough (CDA) and Kurt Lewin, Orlando Fals Borda (participatory action research) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| प्रकार≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761961543 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| उपनाम≠ | PCDA, participatory CDA, collaborative critical discourse analysis, action-oriented CDA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 2 |
| सारांश≠ | Participatory Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) integrates the ideology-exposing tools of Critical Discourse Analysis with the community-centred ethics of participatory action research. Researchers and community members jointly collect and analyse texts and talk to reveal how language constructs, legitimises, or contests unequal power relations — and then use those insights to drive concrete social change. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|