विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| क्रमिक सामग्री वैधता मूल्यांकन× | मद विश्लेषण (शास्त्रीय परीक्षण सिद्धांत)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | मनोमिति | मनोमिति |
| परिवार | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 2003 | 1979 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Classical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986) |
| प्रकार≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Descriptive / psychometric screening |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333 |
| उपनाम≠ | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | Madde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysis |
| संबंधित≠ | 4 | 5 |
| सारांश≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|