विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| नोमोलॉजिकल वैधता× | पुष्टिकारीय कारक विश्लेषण (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | मनोमिति | मनोमिति |
| परिवार | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1955 | 1969 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| प्रकार≠ | Validity evidence framework | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम≠ | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 4 |
| सारांश≠ | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|