विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| एकाधिक केस-आधारित रूपक विश्लेषण× | विमर्श विश्लेषण (Discourse Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र≠ | गुणात्मक | गुणात्मक अनुसंधान |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| प्रकार≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| उपनाम≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 2 |
| सारांश≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|