विधियों की तुलना करें

	Motivated Reasoning Experiment	Need for Closure Scale
क्षेत्र	राजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान	राजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान
परिवार	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
उद्भव वर्ष	2006	1994
प्रवर्तक	Charles Taber & Milton Lodge	Donna M. Webster & Arie W. Kruglanski
प्रकार	Survey/lab experiment	Self-report individual-difference scale
मौलिक स्रोत	Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.	Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062.
उपनाम	Directional Motivated Reasoning Study, Biased Assimilation Experiment, Disconfirmation Bias Paradigm	NFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski Scale
संबंधित	4	4
सारांश	A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.	The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change.