ScholarGate
सहायक

विधियों की तुलना करें

चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।

मिलान विधियाँ (CEM / इष्टतम / आनुवंशिक)×छिपे हुए पूर्वाग्रह के लिए संवेदनशीलता विश्लेषण (रोजनबाम बाउंड्स / ई-वैल्यू)×
क्षेत्रकारणात्मक अनुमानकारणात्मक अनुमान
परिवारRegression modelRegression model
उद्भव वर्ष20122002
प्रवर्तकIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value)
प्रकारMatching for causal inferenceSensitivity analysis for causal inference
मौलिक स्रोतIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679
उपनामcoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEMRosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity
संबंधित55
सारांशMatching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017).
ScholarGateडेटासेट
  1. v1
  2. 2 स्रोत
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 स्रोत
  3. PUBLISHED

खोज पर जाएँ स्लाइड डाउनलोड करें

ScholarGateविधियों की तुलना करें: Matching Methods · Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding. 2026-06-17 को यहाँ से प्राप्त https://scholargate.app/hi/compare