विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| मशीन लर्निंग-ऑग्मेंटेड काउंटरफैक्टुअल इम्पैक्ट इवैल्यूएशन× | प्रोपेंसिटी स्कोर मैचिंग× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र≠ | कारणात्मक अनुमान | अनुसंधान सांख्यिकी |
| परिवार≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 2016-2019 | 1983 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Chernozhukov et al.; Athey & Imbens | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| प्रकार≠ | Causal inference / ML-augmented evaluation | Method |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम≠ | ML-augmented counterfactual evaluation, ML-CIE, causal ML impact evaluation, double ML counterfactual evaluation | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| संबंधित≠ | 5 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | Machine learning-augmented counterfactual impact evaluation combines the credibility of potential-outcomes causal inference with the flexibility of modern ML algorithms. Rather than imposing parametric functional forms for confounders, ML learners — such as lasso, random forests, or neural nets — estimate nuisance functions (propensity scores, outcome regressions) that are then used to construct approximately unbiased estimates of causal effects. The canonical instantiation is Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML), formalized by Chernozhukov et al. (2018). | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|