विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| L2T-SAW का भाषाई विस्तार× | विश्लेषणात्मक पदानुक्रम प्रक्रिया× | सर्वश्रेष्ठ-निकृष्टतम विधि (Best-Worst Method)× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | निर्णयन | निर्णयन | निर्णयन |
| परिवार | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 2018 | 1980 | 2015 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. |
| प्रकार≠ | Linguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α)) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Prioritization of the launch of ICT products and services through linguistic multi-criteria decision-making (2-tuple SAW). Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम | — | — | — |
| संबंधित | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| सारांश≠ | L2T-SAW (Linguistic extension of L2T-SAW) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Cid-López, A., Hornos, M. J., Carrasco, R. A., Herrera-Viedma, E. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|
|