विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| व्याख्यात्मक रूपक विश्लेषण× | विमर्श विश्लेषण (Discourse Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र≠ | गुणात्मक | गुणात्मक अनुसंधान |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| प्रकार≠ | Qualitative interpretive analysis | Method |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| उपनाम≠ | IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 2 |
| सारांश≠ | Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|