विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| GRADE साक्ष्य प्रोफाइलिंग: साक्ष्य की निश्चितता और अनुशंसा की शक्ति का आकलन× | CASP यादृच्छिक नियंत्रित परीक्षण चेकलिस्ट× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | अनुसंधान पद्धति | अनुसंधान पद्धति |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 2008 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| प्रकार≠ | Research team / Guideline panel assessment | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| उपनाम | GRADE, GRADE approach | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| संबंधित | 4 | 4 |
| सारांश≠ | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|