विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| एम्बेडेड केस स्टडी× | कार्यक्रम मूल्यांकन× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र≠ | गुणात्मक | क्षेत्र विधियाँ |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1984–1995 (Yin's foundational editions; Stake 1995) | 1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971) |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Robert K. Yin (systematic case study design); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic tradition) | Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi |
| प्रकार≠ | Qualitative research method | Applied evaluation methodology |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944 |
| उपनाम | embedded single-case design, multiple-unit case study, nested case study, embedded unit analysis | evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | An embedded case study is a case study design in which one or more units of analysis are nested within a single overarching case. Rather than treating the case as a single, holistic entity, the researcher deliberately examines multiple sub-units — such as departments within an organisation, classrooms within a school, or programmes within a hospital — to build a richer, more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon under study. Formalised by Robert K. Yin, the design is contrasted with the holistic single-case study and with multi-case (multiple-case) designs. | Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|