विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| कंप्यूटरीकृत अनुकूली परीक्षण (CAT) में सामग्री वैधता× | सामग्री वैधता× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | मनोमिति | मनोमिति |
| परिवार | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1975 / 1980 | 1975 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework) | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement |
| प्रकार≠ | Validity evaluation / test design | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure |
| मौलिक स्रोत | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ |
| उपनाम | CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validity | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation |
| संबंधित | 6 | 6 |
| सारांश≠ | Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level. | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|