विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| प्रतिस्पर्धी जोखिम उत्तरजीविता विश्लेषण× | उत्तरजीविता वक्रों की तुलना के लिए लॉग-रैंक परीक्षण× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | उत्तरजीविता | उत्तरजीविता |
| परिवार | Survival analysis | Survival analysis |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1999 | 1966 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Fine, J.P. & Gray, R.J. | Mantel, N. |
| प्रकार≠ | Competing risks survival model | Non-parametric hypothesis test |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Fine, J.P. & Gray, R.J. (1999). A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗ | Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 50(3), 163–170. link ↗ |
| उपनाम | Rekabet Eden Riskler Analizi, cumulative incidence function, CIF analysis, cause-specific survival analysis | Mantel log-rank test, Mantel-Cox test, log-rank sağkalım testi, Log-Rank Testi |
| संबंधित≠ | 5 | 2 |
| सारांश≠ | Competing risks analysis, formalized by Fine and Gray in 1999, is a survival analysis framework for settings where a subject can experience one of several mutually exclusive event types. The key quantity is the cumulative incidence function (CIF), which estimates the probability of a specific event occurring by time t in the presence of the other competing events. | The log-rank test, developed by Nathan Mantel in 1966, is a non-parametric hypothesis test that compares the overall survival experience of two or more groups throughout the entire follow-up period. It is the standard companion to Kaplan-Meier curves and determines whether observed differences between curves are statistically meaningful. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|