विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| क्लस्टर यादृच्छिक फील्ड प्रयोग× | क्षेत्र प्रयोग× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | प्रयोगात्मक अभिकल्प | प्रयोगात्मक अभिकल्प |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1980s–1990s (formalized methodology) | 1920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences) |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | David M. Murray (group-randomized trials framework); applied broadly in public health and education research | Formalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004) |
| प्रकार≠ | Randomized experimental design | Experimental design |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120424 | Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम | CRFE, cluster-randomized trial in the field, group-randomized field experiment, community-randomized field experiment | field trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT |
| संबंधित≠ | 4 | 5 |
| सारांश≠ | A cluster randomized field experiment (CRFE) assigns intact groups — schools, villages, clinics, workplaces — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions, and the experiment is conducted in real-world settings rather than a laboratory. Randomization at the group level controls for contamination between conditions while preserving the ecological validity of the natural environment. It is the dominant design for evaluating community-level, school-based, or workplace interventions in public health, education policy, and development economics. | A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|